ASTRONOMERS DISCOVERS MEGA-EARTH

Boston (U.S.) – Astronomers have discovered a new type
of rocky planet beyond the solar system that weighs
more than 17 times as much as Earth while being just
over twice the size, scientists said.
The so-called “mega-Earth” circles a very old star called
Kepler-10, which is located about 560 light-years away
from Earth in the constellation Draco.
Physicist Dimitar Sasselov, the Director of the Harvard
Origins of Life Initiative, said the discovery, announced
at the American Astronomical Society meeting in Boston,
U.S., was a surprise since big planets were believed to
be mostly gas, not solid rocky bodies like Earth or Mars.
Sasselov told reporters at a news conference in Boston,
U.S. that the scientists do not yet understand how the
planet, known as Kepler-10c, formed, with a diameter of
about 18,000 miles (29,000 km), 2.3 times greater than
Earth’s.
“A mega-Earth is a lot of solids concentrated in the
same place without any gas. That is a problem because
our understanding of how planets form requires the
solids to get together in an environment where almost
99 per cent of the mass is hydrogen and helium,’’ he
added.
He explained that smaller solid bodies like Earth or
Mars, believed to form from leftover materials, take
less time to pull themselves together, with longer
incubation time.
He added that large planets should gather up massive
amounts of gas in the process – or so scientists thought.
“However the mega-Earths are formed, the discovery of
another type of rocky world augurs well in the search
for life beyond Earth,’’ Sasselov added.
He stressed that “as far as we know – and we know very
little about origins of life – we think the emergence of
life from geochemistry occurs on solid planets.’’
Related research shows that about 75 per cent of the
planets found with NASA’s Kepler space telescope are
less than four times Earth’s diameter.
In the solar system, there is nothing between the size
of Earth, the largest rocky planet, and Neptune, the
smallest gas giant with a diameter nearly four times
Earth’s.
“We really want to know about these planets,”
astronomer Lars Buchhave, with the Harvard-
Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics, told reporters.
(Reuters/NAN)

Comments

The Sphere

Photograph by Elena Saavedra Buckley. Once when I was about twelve I was walking down the dead-end road in Albuquerque where I grew up, around twilight with a friend. Far beyond the end of the road was a mountain range, and at that time of evening it flattened into a matte indigo wash, like a mural. While kicking down the asphalt we saw a small bright light appear at the top of the peaks, near where we knew radio towers to occasionally emit flashes of red. But this glare, blinding and colorless, grew at an alarming rate. It looked like a single floodlight and then a tight swarm beginning to leak over the edge of the summit. My friend and I became frightened, and as the light poured from the crest, our murmurs turned into screams. We stood there, clutching our heads, screaming. I knew this was the thing that was going to come and get me. It was finally going to show me the horrifying wiring that lay just behind the visible universe and that was inside of me too. And then, a couple se

The Rejection Plot

Print from Trouble , by Bruce Charlesworth, a portfolio which appeared in The Paris Review in the magazine’s Fall 1985 issue. Rejection may be universal, but as plots go, it’s second-rate—all buildup and no closure, an inherent letdown. Stories are usually defined by progress: the development of events toward their conclusions, characters toward their fates, questions toward understanding, themes toward fulfillment. But unlike marriage, murder, and war, rejection offers no obstacles to surmount, milestones to mark, rituals to observe. If a plot point is a shift in a state of affairs—the meeting of a long-lost twin, the fateful red stain on a handkerchief—rejection offers none; what was true before is true after. Nothing happens, no one is materially harmed, and the rejected party loses nothing but the cherished prospect of something they never had to begin with. If the romance plot sets up an enticing question—Will they or won’t they? — the rejection plot spoils everything upfront:

On the Distinctiveness of Writing in China

Yan Lianke at the Salon du Livre, 2010. Photograph by Georges Seguin, via Wikimedia Commons . Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED . When I talk to non-Chinese readers like yourselves, I often find that you are interested in hearing about what distinguishes me as an author but also what distinguishes my country—and particularly details that go beyond what you see on the television, read about in newspapers, and hear about from tourists. I know that China’s international reputation is like that of a young upstart from the countryside who has money but lacks culture, education, and knowledge. Of course, in addition to money, this young upstart also has things like despotism and injustice, while lacking democracy and freedom. The result is like a wild man who is loaded with gold bullion but wears shabby clothing, behaves rudely, stinks of bad breath, and never plays by the rules. If an author must write under the oversight of this sort of individual, how should that author evaluate, discu

TOBI'S DESK

Search This Blog