Skip to main content

MESSI IS WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE FOOTBALLER

GENEVA (AFP) – Barcelona and Argentina star Lionel
Messi remains the world’s most valuable footballer, even
though his crown slipped this season, a market study
showed on Wednesday.
In its annual report on the player market, the Swiss-
based CIES Football Observatory put Messi’s value at
216 million euros ($294 million).
Even though Messi’s lower performance levels slashed 19
million euros from his market value, he was still worth
almost twice as much as arch-rival Cristiano Ronaldo,
second in the ranking on 114 million euros.
CIES said that Messi’s higher value was mainly related
to his younger age — he turns 27 this month, while
Portuguese icon Ronaldo is already 29.
Ronaldo’s heroics this season with Champions League
winners Real Madrid meanwhile saw his market value
climb by four million euros.
The study also showed that Real Madrid did the worst
deal — in market terms — for a single player when they
spent a record 100 million euros to sign Welshman
Gareth Bale from London club Tottenham.
“Real Madrid clearly paid over the odds to convince
Tottenham to release the player,” CIES said, underlining
that Bale’s market value was now 37 million euros less
than he cost the Spanish club.
Real spent an average of 32.3 million euros per player to
build its Champions League squad — the most expensive
line-up on record.
Champions League runners-up Atletico Madrid, who this
season also clinched the Spanish title, made do with 4.3
million euros per player.
Other clubs where results outstripped spending included
Crystal Palace in England, Elche in Spain, Guingamp in
France, Augsburg in Germany and Verona in Italy, the
study showed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Sphere

Photograph by Elena Saavedra Buckley. Once when I was about twelve I was walking down the dead-end road in Albuquerque where I grew up, around twilight with a friend. Far beyond the end of the road was a mountain range, and at that time of evening it flattened into a matte indigo wash, like a mural. While kicking down the asphalt we saw a small bright light appear at the top of the peaks, near where we knew radio towers to occasionally emit flashes of red. But this glare, blinding and colorless, grew at an alarming rate. It looked like a single floodlight and then a tight swarm beginning to leak over the edge of the summit. My friend and I became frightened, and as the light poured from the crest, our murmurs turned into screams. We stood there, clutching our heads, screaming. I knew this was the thing that was going to come and get me. It was finally going to show me the horrifying wiring that lay just behind the visible universe and that was inside of me too. And then, a couple se

The Rejection Plot

Print from Trouble , by Bruce Charlesworth, a portfolio which appeared in The Paris Review in the magazine’s Fall 1985 issue. Rejection may be universal, but as plots go, it’s second-rate—all buildup and no closure, an inherent letdown. Stories are usually defined by progress: the development of events toward their conclusions, characters toward their fates, questions toward understanding, themes toward fulfillment. But unlike marriage, murder, and war, rejection offers no obstacles to surmount, milestones to mark, rituals to observe. If a plot point is a shift in a state of affairs—the meeting of a long-lost twin, the fateful red stain on a handkerchief—rejection offers none; what was true before is true after. Nothing happens, no one is materially harmed, and the rejected party loses nothing but the cherished prospect of something they never had to begin with. If the romance plot sets up an enticing question—Will they or won’t they? — the rejection plot spoils everything upfront:

On the Distinctiveness of Writing in China

Yan Lianke at the Salon du Livre, 2010. Photograph by Georges Seguin, via Wikimedia Commons . Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED . When I talk to non-Chinese readers like yourselves, I often find that you are interested in hearing about what distinguishes me as an author but also what distinguishes my country—and particularly details that go beyond what you see on the television, read about in newspapers, and hear about from tourists. I know that China’s international reputation is like that of a young upstart from the countryside who has money but lacks culture, education, and knowledge. Of course, in addition to money, this young upstart also has things like despotism and injustice, while lacking democracy and freedom. The result is like a wild man who is loaded with gold bullion but wears shabby clothing, behaves rudely, stinks of bad breath, and never plays by the rules. If an author must write under the oversight of this sort of individual, how should that author evaluate, discu