Skip to main content

HOW GEJ LEFT POWER TO SAVE LIVES.


Dr. Abubakar Sulaiman, the immediate past minister of
National Planning on Sunday, November 29, disclosed why
former president Goodluck Jonathan decided to hand over
power to President Muhammadu Buhari.
Abubakar Sulaiman
Sulaiman said Jonathan took the decision in order to save the
lives of many Nigerians.
The former minister explained further that Jonathan had
enough evidence to remove former chairman of the
Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor
Attahiru Jega but decided not to take such action.
Sulaiman made this disclosure when he delivered a paper on
2015 power transition in Nigeria at the annual Zink dinner
lecture/award in Abuja.
He noted that contrary to what most people think, there were
cases of compromise by INEC, Vanguard reports.

Sulaiman said: “ Few months to the general elections, there were
calls from some quarters for the sack of the INEC Chairman, Prof.
Attairu Jega.
“There were sufficient grounds for such calls but President
Goodluck maintained a position that taking such decision would
altercate the process and create an impression which only an
insider would understand. There were indeed cases of compromise
on the part of the commission, but as the president so wished, let
the sleeping dog lies.
“Invariably, the decision to maintain the status quo in the
commission by the administration was one decision that further led
credence to the peaceful outcome of the electoral process. We
must not forget that the president in his exercise of his
constitutional power has the authority to fire the chairman and
replace him with any of the National Commissioners to preside
over the commission.

“Nobody should be on the illusion that the president lacked the gut
to exercise such power. After all, Gen. Babangida annulled the
June 12 election, thereby depriving Chief M.K.O Abiola of his
awaiting victory.
“It is within context of this remarkable gesture and unparallel
leadership style of the president that I found it disturbing when the
APC led government sometimes grudgingly acknowledged this fact
or believed that it was the external pressure that accounted for such
political accomplishment .”
He pointed out that former president could use his incumbency
factor to scuttle Buhari’s election if he so wishes .
“ The extent to which a political transition is peaceful and credible
depends largely on variance of factors. We have however
demonstrated the import of leadership factor has been
consequential to the outcome of any electoral process. Is it the
leadership that was out to tame the process or the one that respect
the sanctity of the electoral body and other agencies?
“This paper has successfully argued that more than any
government in the past, the Jonathan administration has
demonstrated penchant for rule of law, freedom and untainted
electoral process.
“The power of a president is such that if he had wanted to truncate
the process or manipulate it, he could have,” the ex-minister
concluded.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Sphere

Photograph by Elena Saavedra Buckley. Once when I was about twelve I was walking down the dead-end road in Albuquerque where I grew up, around twilight with a friend. Far beyond the end of the road was a mountain range, and at that time of evening it flattened into a matte indigo wash, like a mural. While kicking down the asphalt we saw a small bright light appear at the top of the peaks, near where we knew radio towers to occasionally emit flashes of red. But this glare, blinding and colorless, grew at an alarming rate. It looked like a single floodlight and then a tight swarm beginning to leak over the edge of the summit. My friend and I became frightened, and as the light poured from the crest, our murmurs turned into screams. We stood there, clutching our heads, screaming. I knew this was the thing that was going to come and get me. It was finally going to show me the horrifying wiring that lay just behind the visible universe and that was inside of me too. And then, a couple se

The Rejection Plot

Print from Trouble , by Bruce Charlesworth, a portfolio which appeared in The Paris Review in the magazine’s Fall 1985 issue. Rejection may be universal, but as plots go, it’s second-rate—all buildup and no closure, an inherent letdown. Stories are usually defined by progress: the development of events toward their conclusions, characters toward their fates, questions toward understanding, themes toward fulfillment. But unlike marriage, murder, and war, rejection offers no obstacles to surmount, milestones to mark, rituals to observe. If a plot point is a shift in a state of affairs—the meeting of a long-lost twin, the fateful red stain on a handkerchief—rejection offers none; what was true before is true after. Nothing happens, no one is materially harmed, and the rejected party loses nothing but the cherished prospect of something they never had to begin with. If the romance plot sets up an enticing question—Will they or won’t they? — the rejection plot spoils everything upfront:

On the Distinctiveness of Writing in China

Yan Lianke at the Salon du Livre, 2010. Photograph by Georges Seguin, via Wikimedia Commons . Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED . When I talk to non-Chinese readers like yourselves, I often find that you are interested in hearing about what distinguishes me as an author but also what distinguishes my country—and particularly details that go beyond what you see on the television, read about in newspapers, and hear about from tourists. I know that China’s international reputation is like that of a young upstart from the countryside who has money but lacks culture, education, and knowledge. Of course, in addition to money, this young upstart also has things like despotism and injustice, while lacking democracy and freedom. The result is like a wild man who is loaded with gold bullion but wears shabby clothing, behaves rudely, stinks of bad breath, and never plays by the rules. If an author must write under the oversight of this sort of individual, how should that author evaluate, discu