Skip to main content

PICTURES AND STATISTICS FROM THE FINALS OF DISPENSERS LEAGUE MADONNA UNIVERSITY 2016




The dispensers league 2016 must have come and gone, but the memories from the day will sure last for a very long time, below Is the official statement from the organising committee.


DISPENSERS LEAGUE MATCHDAY 13 (FINAL)
                                          STATISTICS
                          AMPICILLIN FC            ARTEMETHER FC
GOALS                                       1                          0
ATTEMPTS ON TARGET         3                          2
POSSESSION                         54%                       46%

The 2016 season of the dispensers league was concluded yesterday with AMPICILLIN FC having the privilege to lift the trophy in the end. Both teams played well in the opening half and also were well coordinated and cautious with their game play to prevent conceding an early goal. To win a football match you must score at least one goal more than your opponent, The only goal of the game came in the 64th minute from VICTOR the youngest star of the league this season who was assisted by SUPER FWANKY the Captain and playmaker of AMPICILLIN FC, It was an Inspirational goal from the young star who was a valuable player for his team. Well for ARTEMETHER FC they played well with a very good game plan but like my Professor said in a lecture "Planning enhances chances of success, though it does not guarantee success".
AMPICILLIN FC are now the reigning Champions of the dispensers league conceding no goal this season,  this was made possible by the combined efforts of the goalkeeper GIB JOE and the Defenders SOMTEE AND RICHIE. ARTEMETHER FC came second.

A Big thank you to all who made this season a success... Thanks for your support, We really appreciate. One love,  one Pharmily.

Chairman                             Vice Chairman
Paschal Ogbogu                    Galvin Okorie

more pix.......










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Sphere

Photograph by Elena Saavedra Buckley. Once when I was about twelve I was walking down the dead-end road in Albuquerque where I grew up, around twilight with a friend. Far beyond the end of the road was a mountain range, and at that time of evening it flattened into a matte indigo wash, like a mural. While kicking down the asphalt we saw a small bright light appear at the top of the peaks, near where we knew radio towers to occasionally emit flashes of red. But this glare, blinding and colorless, grew at an alarming rate. It looked like a single floodlight and then a tight swarm beginning to leak over the edge of the summit. My friend and I became frightened, and as the light poured from the crest, our murmurs turned into screams. We stood there, clutching our heads, screaming. I knew this was the thing that was going to come and get me. It was finally going to show me the horrifying wiring that lay just behind the visible universe and that was inside of me too. And then, a couple se

The Rejection Plot

Print from Trouble , by Bruce Charlesworth, a portfolio which appeared in The Paris Review in the magazine’s Fall 1985 issue. Rejection may be universal, but as plots go, it’s second-rate—all buildup and no closure, an inherent letdown. Stories are usually defined by progress: the development of events toward their conclusions, characters toward their fates, questions toward understanding, themes toward fulfillment. But unlike marriage, murder, and war, rejection offers no obstacles to surmount, milestones to mark, rituals to observe. If a plot point is a shift in a state of affairs—the meeting of a long-lost twin, the fateful red stain on a handkerchief—rejection offers none; what was true before is true after. Nothing happens, no one is materially harmed, and the rejected party loses nothing but the cherished prospect of something they never had to begin with. If the romance plot sets up an enticing question—Will they or won’t they? — the rejection plot spoils everything upfront:

On the Distinctiveness of Writing in China

Yan Lianke at the Salon du Livre, 2010. Photograph by Georges Seguin, via Wikimedia Commons . Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 DEED . When I talk to non-Chinese readers like yourselves, I often find that you are interested in hearing about what distinguishes me as an author but also what distinguishes my country—and particularly details that go beyond what you see on the television, read about in newspapers, and hear about from tourists. I know that China’s international reputation is like that of a young upstart from the countryside who has money but lacks culture, education, and knowledge. Of course, in addition to money, this young upstart also has things like despotism and injustice, while lacking democracy and freedom. The result is like a wild man who is loaded with gold bullion but wears shabby clothing, behaves rudely, stinks of bad breath, and never plays by the rules. If an author must write under the oversight of this sort of individual, how should that author evaluate, discu